Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 13:06

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump-Musk feud leaves some DOGE staffers worried about their futures: Sources - ABC News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The Odd Reason Couples Who Argue A Lot Tend To Gain Weight Faster, According To Research - YourTango
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Is Taylor Swift actually a nice person?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Why are people becoming increasingly hostile to pro-lifers? I am pro-life.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
"Oh, Mary!" star Cole Escola manifested their Tony win the old-fashioned way - Salon.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
It’s back! Massive $400 price drop now live on 2TB Space Black M4 iPad Pro at Amazon - 9to5Toys
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.